Founded in 1988 by Radhika Roy and Prannoy Roy, NDTV is today the most watched and the most credible and respected news and lifestyle network in India. The facts and opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of NDTV and NDTV does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.New Delhi Television is, and has been for more than a quarter century, a pioneer in India’s news television. He is currently working on a children's book.) Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. (Raja Sen is a film critic, columnist and screenwriter. The next Baahubali deserves a bigger splash. By fattening our fish we only make our pond look smaller.
What to do about this is the subject of a larger debate and more exhaustive discussion, but contemplate we must.
#Ndtv movies com free#
The film industry, by handing over pretty much every key to the kingdom, has given a few stars free rein to charge whatever they want regardless of the size of the films themselves. (In painfully sharp contrast, Shah Rukh Khan made more money in 2016 than the overall budgets of both his 2016 releases put together.) Every paycheque doesn't fly to superhero heights. This cannot be seen as a sustainable working model, and while I applaud a Khan making more money than a Clooney, it must be noted that George Clooney immediately slashes his rates to act in and to produce smaller films he believes in. The star-system in India has become entirely all-consuming, with all actors producing their own films and getting paid a whopping backend of the profits, leaving little for anyone else. This is one of the reasons many large Indian studios are having to down their shutters or completely revamp their methods.
#Ndtv movies com movie#
Our movie industry truly is as oddly proportioned - absurdly top-heavy - as a real-life Barbie doll. He might as well have dropped a microphone right after. "You guys give Aamir Khan Rs 65 crore when the film's budget is Rs 85 crore!" His point - which is impossible to ignore - is that they give out $20 million paycheques to actors when making $160-$200 million movies. Many years ago I spoke to a Warner Bros executive who was appalled by the way we make movies in India. It shows the extent to which our movie industry is tilted in favour of the stars. However, having our brightest stars rub shoulders with the biggest in the world, at the same time that our most expensive films are made on budgets at par with independent American films, is frightening.
#Ndtv movies com cracked#
It is even, undoubtedly, impressive - particularly the fact that Padukone, notoriously paid much less than her male counterparts, has cracked the list. But he isn't an anomaly: Akshay Kumar is at No 12 (tied with Brad Pitt at $31.5 million), ahead of Salman Khan at No 16, Amitabh Bachchan at No 20 and Deepika Padukone at Number 30. Now Khan is a highly savvy producer and promoter of multiple brands, diversifying into sports and many, many endorsements, and perhaps we shouldn't be surprised that he makes the cut. On the 2016 Forbes list of the highest paid actors in the world, Shah Rukh Khan comes in at number 10, singlehandedly making more money last year ($33 million) than Baahubali's budget. Why in the world should we be expected to match their size?Įxcept we do indeed match, and even exceed, their numbers in one specific department.
We do not come close to matching the unreal (and frequently excessive sizes) of Hollywood behemoths, and seem to be doing just fine upscaling at our own pace, with our films visibly glossier and more slickly produced than ever before.
It is far cheaper to make - and to watch - films in India. For perspective, the recent - and horrible - epic fantasy Gods Of Egypt cost exactly five times as much - and that is the scale Baahubali is battling against. (This is precisely why I used billions to refer to rupee amounts, simply because - as Justin Timberlake said in The Social Network - it sounds cool.) The Butler, a movie about a long-serving White House member of staff, was made for thirty million dollars - which is, I estimate, just about what it cost to make the second Baahubali, give or take a dozen crores. More importantly, it would also be considering the budget: a budget we in India, with the most overstuffed movie industry in the world, are tom-tomming as gigantic.
This would partly be because of the title: only the second film in what could unquestionably be turned into an endless franchise has prematurely been titled The Conclusion. It is also a film Marvel would sneeze at. It is massive sword and sandal stuff, all volume and brawn and battles and high-strung histrionics, and, despite the overt Amar Chitra Katha influence visible in the storytelling, has to be commended for creating its own loud, larger-than-life mythology. Prabhas in a still from Baahubali: The Conclusion